| Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
| 1) |
Introduction |
Nick Wilkinson, Matthias Klaes (2012), An Introduction to Behavioral Economics, MacMillan |
| 2) |
Economic Man’s Rationality |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer.
|
| 3) |
Neuroeconomics |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 4) |
Lotteries and Expected Utility Theory |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 5) |
Mini Quiz |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 6) |
Expected Utility Paradoxes |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 7) |
Prospect Theory |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 8) |
Midterm Exam |
|
| 9) |
Social Preferences and Experiments |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 10) |
Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty |
Nick Wilkinson, Matthias Klaes (2012), An Introduction to Behavioral Economics, MacMillan |
| 11) |
Mutluluk Ekonomisi |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 12) |
Behavioral Biases |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 13) |
Framing and Loss Aversion |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 14) |
Overconfidence and Illusion of Control |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 15) |
Endowment Effect and Cognitive&Emotional Biases |
Tanaka, S. C. (2017). Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Springer. |
| 16) |
Final Exam Review |
|
| |
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
| 1) |
Comprehends fundamental theories, concepts, and models in the fields of economics and finance; explains national and international economic dynamics, market mechanisms, and corporate financial structures. |
|
| 2) |
Utilizes statistical and econometric methods and relevant software effectively to collect and interpret economic and financial data, and to make future projections. |
|
| 3) |
Evaluates research findings with a critical approach to support strategic decision-making processes. |
|
| 4) |
Assesses the multifaceted impacts of global economic and financial developments on national economies and corporate strategies, using diverse theoretical frameworks. |
|
| 5) |
Compares economic and financial policy alternatives for public and private sector organizations and contributes to the development of evidence-based policy recommendations. |
|
| 6) |
Develop innovative and applicable solutions to economic and financial problems focused on societal benefit, while observing sustainability and ethical responsibility principles. |
|
| 7) |
Contributes to the achievement of common goals in multidisciplinary teams by effectively applying expertise in economics and finance. |
|
| 8) |
Systematically conveys knowledge, analyses, and research findings in economics and finance to specialist and non-specialist audiences in written, oral, and visual forms, utilizing information technologies. |
|
| 9) |
Takes responsibility for complex tasks and manages their processes. |
|
| 10) |
Independently directs personal and professional development with a lifelong learning consciousness by following current developments and new technologies in economics and finance. |
|
| 11) |
Acts in accordance with ethical principles, social responsibility, and professional standards at individual and institutional levels while conducting professional activities. |
|